Friday, December 31, 2010

Industry Visit To Asian Paints By IIPM Students

IIPM BBA MBA Institute: Student Notice Board

IIPM is India's Global B-School. It was founded by renowned economic visionary Dr. M.K Chaudhuri in the year 1973. It is every student's dream to get admission in IIPM. IIPM has 18 branches through out India. Delhi campus is the International campus of the institute. IIPM offers premium courses in BBA, MBA, EMBA and BCA IIPM is ranked No.1 in Placement Record,Quality of Faculty and Global Exposure. It is ranked No.2 in Student Development, Potential to Network and Infrastructure. It is ranked No.7 in Course Contents amongst all B-Schools in India

Asian Paints is one of the worlds largest paint corporations. They operate in 17 countries and have 23 paint manufacturing facilities in the world servicing consumers in over 65 countries. Besides Asian Paints, the group operates around the world through its subsidiaries i.e. Berger International Limited, Apco Coatings, SCIB Paints and Taubmans.

The students of IIPM Mumbai (Batch PGP/10-12/FW) visited the Asian Paints Manufacturing Plant on the 21st of December 2010. The students were first introduced to the concept of Total Water Management. At Asian Paints they strongly believe that “EVERY DROP OF WATER COUNTS”. They showcased various models that helped in conserving water. This is a part of Asian Paints CSR (Corporate Social Responsibility) activity. Asian Paints is working hard towards improving awareness about shortage of water and the various problems that come with it.

The students were then taken for a tour of the factory. They were shown how the plant functions, and were then explained the entire operation process of the plant from the purchase of raw materials to its dispatch. The industrial visit proved out to be very informative and educative .

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
Rajita Chaudhuri: The New Age Woman
Prof Rajita Chaudhuri follow some off-beat trends like organizing make up sessions
IIPM Prof Arindam Chaudhuri on Our Parliament and Parliamentarians' Work

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

BORDER DISPUTES SOLUTION: Where is the limit

IIPM Prof Rajita Chaudhuri: The New Age Woman

Some worst border disputes, least talked about'

Where is the limit? History witnesses how ethnicity, culture, race, religion, and language have divided the world into separate political entities. The world which stretches over 2,50,000 km, is divided by 322 land borders into 194 different sovereign states and 71 other dependent entities. Many of these 322 lands and 430 bilateral marine borders are yet to be properly defined which, on quite occasions, has led to severe border disputes. Moreover, unexplored resources, competition between nations and their expansion policies have just added more complexity to it. What is more horrifying is that disputed border areas often attract illegal drug trafficking, migration, human trafficking and many more. However, there are a few territorial disputes that have grabbed some attention by media and the international community and created chaos while many more which pose equal danger have been least talked about. Here is an effort to divulge some of them.

Perhaps, one of the biggest of such disputes is of sovereignty over the islands of Etorofu, Kunashiri, and Shikotan, and the Habomai group - the area which is known to Japanese as the "Northern Territories" while Russians call it the "Southern Kuril Islands." The islands, initially occupied by the USSR in the early 1945 and is presently governed by Russia, have always been claimed by Japan. This dispute has greatly hampered the bilateral relationship between these two influential nations. The next in line is the conflict between UK and Argentina over the issue of controlling the Falkland Islands. The dispute became so severe that it finally led to war between them. The 74 days long war claimed 907 lives in total in 1982. However, the controversial Argentina-Brazil-Paraguay borders dispute was not less notorious. It has encouraged money laundering, smuggling, illegal arms trade and narcotics trafficking. Further, it became a hot spot for fund raising by extremist groups. The next is the Spratly Islands which have always been the bone of contention between Asian nations including the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, Vietnam, and China. The islands does not have much economic importance in itself but they become of extreme importance when it comes to establishing international borders for the neighbouring countries. In South Asia, though the Kashmir issue grabbed much attention, the Pak-Afghan open order poses greater threat. It became base for non-state actors. Moreover, the Indo-Bangladesh or Indo-Bhutan border areas are equally dangerous. Moreover, the decade long border disputes led the illegal migration of thousands of people in countries like Uganda, Congo, Cote d'Ivoire and Rwanda etc.

The issue of border disputes has caused more damage than expected. The Israel-Palestine, Indo-Pak, Indo-China, Kosovo-Serbia wars are results of this. Solution? Certainly not war! Negotiations are a must. The way the Canada-US border dispute or the UK-US Oregon boundary dispute were solved, through negotiations, others should come forward, if not for the sake of the world, then, for the sake of themselves!

An Initiative of IIPM, Malay Chaudhuri and Arindam chaudhuri (Renowned Management Guru and Economist).

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.
IIPM BBA MBA Institute: Student Notice Board
Run after passion and not money, says Arindam Chaudhuri
IIPM Lucknow – News article in Economic Times and Times of India

Prof Rajita Chaudhuri follow some off-beat trends like organizing make up sessions
IIPM Prof Rajita Chaudhuri's Snaps
IIPM Prof Arindam Chaudhuri on Our Parliament and Parliamentarians' Work

Thursday, December 23, 2010

Politics: Impressive rise of the palestine

IIPM Prof Arindam Chaudhuri on Our Parliament and Parliamentarians' Work

Since 2007, Jordan and the US have trained forces in policing and human rights

Thomas Friedman
Thomas Friedman
Economist and NYT Columnist
When I covered the 1982 Lebanon war, I learned something surprising about wars: They attract all kinds of spectators, meddlers, do-gooders and do-badders. They use the conflict and the attention it generates to play out their own identity issues and biases. My favourite in Beirut was a gentleman who showed up in August 1982 as the Palestinian guerrillas were sailing out of Beirut harbour. His name ' I am not making this up ' was Arthur Blessitt, the 'Sunset Boulevard Preacher.' He had walked to West Beirut from Israel to pray for peace, dragging a 13-foot-long wooden cross with a little wheel on the bottom.

Arthur was harmless; some of the others, though, were mendacious, which prompted me to promulgate this rule: I adore the Israelis and Palestinians, but God save me from some of their European and American friends. Their grandstanding interventions like those blockade-busters sailing to Gaza or the wealthy American Jews who fund extremist settlers' housing purchases in Arab East Jerusalem ' often fuel the worst trends on either side and divert our energies from the only thing that is important: forging a two-state solution.

So is there anything good happening in that regard? Yes. The effort by the Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, and the Prime Minister Salam Fayyad to build the institutional foundations of a Palestinian state from the ground up ' replacing the corrupt structure that Yasser Arafat created and Israel destroyed ' is actually making progress. This matters ' and must be nurtured. You see, there are two models of Arab governance. The old Nasserite model, which Hamas still practices, where leaders say: 'Judge me by how I resist Israel or America.' And: 'First we get a state, then we build the institutions.' The new model, pioneered in the West Bank by Abbas and Fayyad is: 'Judge me by how I perform ' how I generate investment and employment, deliver services and pick up the garbage. First we build transparent and effective political and security institutions. Then we declare a state. That is what the Zionists did, and it sure worked for them.' The most important thing going on this conflict today is that since 2007 the Palestinian Authority, Jordan and the US have partnered to train a whole new West Bank Palestinian security force in policing, administration and even human rights. The programme is advised by US Lt Gen Keith Dayton ' one of the unsung good guys. The Israeli army has become impressed enough by the performance of the new Palestinian National Security Force, or NSF, under Abbas and Fayyad that those forces are now largely responsible for law and order in all the major West Bank towns, triggering an explosion of Palestinian building, investment and commerce in those areas.

Here are highlights: The Jordanians have trained and the Palestinian Authority deployed and equipped five NSF battalions and one Presidential Guard unit, some 3,100 men. Plus, 65 Palestinian first-responders have been trained and are being equipped with emergency gear. A Palestinian National Training Centre, with classrooms and dorms, is nearing completion in Jericho so they themselves can takeover the training. The Palestinian Authority is building a 750-man NSF camp to garrison the new NSF troops, including barracks and parade ground near Jenin. At the same time, the Palestinian security headquarters are all being rebuilt in every major town, starting in Hebron. An eight-week senior leadership training course in Jericho ' bringing together the Palestinian police, the NSF and Presidential Guards ' has graduated 280 people, including 20 women.

A course for captains and below in how to handle everything from crowd control to elections has also begun. The reinvigorated Palestinian Ministry of Interior is leading its security sector transformation, and the Canadians are helping set-up Joint Operations Centres across the West Bank so all Palestinian security services can coordinate via video conferencing. Even Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu has reduced Israel's manned checkpoints in the West Bank from 42 to 12. This won't be politically sustainable for Abbas and Fayyad, unless Israel begins to turn full authority over to the Palestinians for their major cities in the West Bank. Palestinians have to see their new security services as building their state, not cushioning Israel's occupation. There could be a moment of truth here for Israel soon but it will be based on something real. Palestinians building real institutions from the ground up and getting Israel to cede to them real authority ' is the ball game. Make it work across the West Bank and find a way to transfer it to Gaza (how about reopening the Israel-Gaza border and letting the new Palestinian NSF control the passages to Israel?) and a two-state solution is possible. Let it fail, and we'll have endless conflict. Everything else is just a sideshow.

For More IIPM Info, Visit below mentioned IIPM articles.

Prof Rajita Chaudhuri follow some off-beat trends like organizing make up sessions
IIPM Prof Rajita Chaudhuri's Snaps
IIPM BBA MBA Institute: Student Notice Board
Run after passion and not money, says Arindam Chaudhuri
Award Conferred To Irom Chanu Sharmila By IIPM